STEAM 103-Week 5-Forum Discussion-Analysing an Engineering Design Resource

[Saadia Faisal]

Assignment: Explore and Evaluate an EDP Resource

 Instructions 

This week, you’ll engage with an online resource library on the Engineering Design Process (EDP). You will explore, reflect, and share insights on one resource that resonates with you.

Step 1: Visit the link Engineering Design Process

Step 2: Explore the Site

Scan through videos, templates, visuals, explanation, and other tools.
Choose one resource (a diagram, template or video) that caught your eye, connected with your teaching needs, or sparked your curiosity.

Step 3: Post in the Forum

In your post, include:

A short but concise description of the resource
A reflection using the questions below

Reflection & Analysis Questions

Use these prompts to structure your post:

Why did you select this resource?
What made it stand out to you personally or professionally?
How does this resource support the teaching or understanding of the engineering design process?
How do you imagine using this in your classroom? How developmentally appropriate is this for your grade level or learners? What modifications would you make to suit your learners or context?
What questions or uncertainties do you still have about this resource?
How might your selected resource foster skills and habits of mind in students (creativity, iteration, communication, research, critical thinking, flexible thinking, problem solving etc.)? 

Self-Review Checklist

Before posting, ensure your response includes:

 I clearly identified and described one specific resource
 I explained why I chose this resource
 I analysed how it supports the Engineering Design Process in STEAM
 I reflected on how I will use or adapt this in my teaching
 I asked at least one thoughtful question about the resource
 I responded in a clear, organised, and engaging tone

Peer Review Checklist

After posting, review at least one other teacher’s post and respond thoughtfully using the guide below:

 Did they explain why the resource is relevant and meaningful to them?
 Did they show an understanding of how it connects to the Engineering Design Process?
 Did they suggest an implementation idea that fits their classroom?
 Did they pose a meaningful question that sparked your thinking?
 Your response includes:
A specific compliment on their reflection
A connection to your own teaching experience
A follow-up idea, resource, or question

Use the feedback model to give feedback. 

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Bothaina Ellymony]

Resource I Chose: Engineering Design Process Wheel – Visual Diagram

Short Description:
This is a bright, colorful diagram that breaks down the Engineering Design Process into five simple steps: Ask, Imagine, Design, Evaluate, and Explain. Each step comes with a little question to nudge learners along. The wheel shape is awesome because it shows that engineering isn’t a straight line—you can loop back and revisit steps as needed.

My Reflection
Why did you select this resource?
I was instantly drawn to this diagram because it’s so clear and approachable. I’m looking for tools that make big concepts easy for my learners to grasp, and this one nails it. It’s inviting and doesn’t overwhelm kids with too much information.

What made it stand out to you personally or professionally?
Personally, I love visuals that are clean and don’t cram in too much text—I’m a visual learner myself! Professionally, I think this is spot-on for young kids, especially those just experimenting with engineering and STEAM. It is ideal for beginners because it is straightforward but powerful.

How does this resource support the teaching or understanding of the engineering design process?
This diagram shows learners that engineering is all about thinking, trying things out, and making them better. It reassures them that it’s okay if their first try flops—they can tweak and improve. The circular design is a great reminder that the process keeps going, and you don’t just stop after one go.

How do I imagine using this in my classroom? How developmentally appropriate is it for my learners? What modifications would I make?
I imagine using this Engineering Design Process (EDP) diagram as a regular part of my STEM or science lessons. I would introduce it before any project or hands-on activity to help my learners understand that solving a problem takes steps—and that it’s okay to go back and improve their work.
I will print the diagram in large size and display it in the classroom as a poster. I will also give each group a small version to use while they work. During the activity, I can guide learners by asking questions like:
• “Have you finished the ‘Ask’ step?”
• “Are you still imagining or already planning?”
• “What would you improve if it doesn’t work?”
For my learners (Years 4-6), this resource is developmentally appropriate. The words are simple, and the visual layout helps them remember the process easily. It also supports learners who are still building English skills because it uses short keywords and icons.
However, I might modify it slightly for younger learners or mixed-ability groups. For example:
• Use simpler language like “Think of ideas” instead of “Imagine”
• Include sentence starters for each step to help guide their thinking and communication
• I might make is adding sentence starters or prompts for each step, like “I wonder if…” for “Ask” or “We could try…” for “Imagine,” to support learners during group work and discussions.
These small changes can help all learners feel more confident and engaged in using the engineering design process.

What questions or uncertainties do you still have about this resource?
I’m wondering how to really dig into the “Improve” step, especially when time’s tight. I want my learners to reflect deeply and think about how to make things better, not just slap on a quick fix. Any ideas on making that step more meaningful in a short class?

How might your selected resource foster skills and habits of mind in students (creativity, iteration, communication, research, critical thinking, flexible thinking, problem solving etc.)?
The Engineering Design Process (EDP) diagram can support many important skills and ways of thinking in my learners.
First, it encourages creativity in the “Imagine” step. Learners are asked to think of different ideas and explore solutions before choosing one. This helps them understand that there is not only one right answer.
It also teaches iteration—that it’s normal and even expected to go back, try again, and improve their work. This helps build resilience and shows that mistakes are part of learning.
The “Desigen” and “Evaluate” steps help learners develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. They have to think about what might work, what went wrong, and how to fix it.
The “Explain” process also supports communication and collaboration, especially when learners work in pairs or groups. They must share their ideas, listen to others, and agree on a plan before creating their design.
Finally, the flexible structure of the diagram helps learners develop flexible thinking. They learn that the path to solving a problem is not always straight—and that going back to rethink or change a plan is a smart choice, not a failure.
By using this visual tool often, I believe my learners will start to think more like engineers—curious, thoughtful, creative, and confident problem-solvers.

[Nahla Yehia]

Hi Bothaina,
Thank you for sharing your thoughtful reflection on the Engineering Design Process Wheel – Visual Diagram!

Compliment:
I really appreciated how clearly you articulated the value of the wheel’s circular layout and its simplicity. Your idea of pairing the visual with guiding questions like (Are you still imagining or already planning?) is a fantastic way to scaffold student thinking and keep them engaged throughout the process. The way you described using sentence starters to support learners during each step also shows such care for diverse learners in your classroom.

Connection to My Teaching:
Like you, I also teach Years 4–6, and I’ve found that visual anchors like this one can really help students “stick” with a process instead of rushing to finish a product. I also emphasize iteration in my classroom, and I loved your point about helping students see failure not as an endpoint but as a chance to improve. That shift in mindset takes time, and your strategies feel very age-appropriate and supportive.

Follow-Up Idea/Question:
To your excellent question about how to make the (Improve) step more meaningful especially when class time is limited. I wonder if using a quick (reflection round) at the end of each session might help. Maybe just 2–3 minutes where students answer one question like: (What would you change next time and why?) on a sticky note or in their STEM journal. Over time, that habit might deepen their reflection even in short bursts.
Have you ever tried using peer feedback during the Improve step? Sometimes a quick gallery walk or partner check-in can give fresh ideas in a short timeframe.
Thanks again for a well-organized and inspiring post. You’ve definitely sparked some new ideas for me!
Warmly,
Nahla

[Aya Fouad]

Dear Bothaina,
Your reflection is incredibly thoughtful and detailed, demonstrating a deep understanding of how the Engineering Design Process (EDP) Wheel can be effectively integrated into your classroom. You’ve clearly articulated why this resource resonates with you personally and professionally, and you’ve provided specific examples of how it supports key skills like creativity, iteration, and communication. Your implementation ideas are practical and well-suited to your learners’ developmental level, showing that you’ve put considerable thought into adapting the resource for your context. As an educator myself, I completely relate to your emphasis on visuals and simplicity. In my own teaching, I’ve found that clear, approachable diagrams like the EDP Wheel are invaluable for helping students grasp complex processes without feeling overwhelmed.
Your question about making the “Improve” step more meaningful is spot-on, and it’s something I’ve grappled with as well. One idea I’d suggest is incorporating reflective journals or “Improvement Logs” where students document their iterations and explain why they made certain changes. This not only helps them reflect deeply but also provides a tangible record of their learning process. Here’s how you might implement this:

Reflective Journals: Have students keep a simple journal or log where they jot down notes after each iteration. For example:
Before Improving: “I noticed that my prototype didn’t work because ……………………”
After Improving: “I changed [specific part] because [reason], and now it works better.
If you’re looking for more structured ways to deepen the “Improve” step, you might explore resources like the Engineering Design Process Toolkit from TeachEngineering.org. This toolkit includes lesson plans and activities specifically designed to help students reflect on their designs and iterate effectively. Additionally, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) provide excellent guidance on integrating engineering practices into K-12 education, which could complement your use of the EDP Wheel.
Keep up the great work, and don’t hesitate to experiment with different approaches to make the “Improve” step even more impactful. Your learners will undoubtedly benefit from your thoughtful and creative approach!

[Aya Fouad]

I have chosen Comparing the Engineering Design Process and the Scientific Method diagram. (Attached).

This resource is a comparative diagram that illustrates the Scientific Method and the Engineering Method , highlighting their similarities and differences. The Scientific Method is depicted on the left, with steps such as “Ask a Question,” “Do Background Research,” “Construct a Hypothesis,” “Test with an Experiment,” and “Analyze Data and Draw Conclusions.” On the right, the Engineering Method includes steps like “Define the Problem,” “Do Background Research,” “Specify Requirements,” “Brainstorm, Evaluate, and Choose Solution,” “Develop and Prototype Solution,” “Test Solution,” and “Communicate Results.” Both methods are visually connected to emphasize iterative processes and the cyclical nature of learning and problem-solving.

Why did you select this resource?
I selected this resource because it provides a clear and concise comparison between the Scientific Method and the Engineering Method. As an educator, I often find that students struggle to differentiate between these two approaches, especially when they are introduced to engineering design for the first time. This diagram helps bridge the gap by showing how both methods share foundational elements (e.g., background research, testing, and communication) while also highlighting their unique focuses (hypothesis-driven experimentation vs. solution-focused prototyping).

What made it stand out to you personally or professionally?
Professionally, this resource stands out because it uses a visual format that is easy to understand and engaging. The use of color-coding and arrows to show iterations and feedback loops makes the concepts accessible even to younger learners. Personally, I appreciate how it emphasizes the iterative nature of both methods, which is crucial for teaching students about the importance of revising and refining ideas based on data and results. The inclusion of specific steps like “Troubleshoot procedure” in the Scientific Method and “Develop and Prototype Solution” in the Engineering Method adds depth and realism to the process.

How does this resource support the teaching or understanding of the engineering design process?
This resource supports the teaching of the engineering design process by providing a structured framework that mirrors real-world engineering practices. It highlights key stages such as defining problems, brainstorming solutions, prototyping, and testing, which are essential components of engineering. By comparing it to the Scientific Method, students can see how engineering involves more than just experimentation—it requires creativity, collaboration, and practical application.

How do you imagine using this in your classroom? How developmentally appropriate is this for your grade level or learners? What modifications would you make to suit your learners or context?
In my classroom, I would use this resource as a starting point for introducing the engineering design process. For middle school or high school students, the diagram is highly appropriate because it aligns with their developing critical thinking and analytical skills. However, for younger students (e.g., elementary grades), I might simplify the language and focus on key steps like “Ask a Question” and “Test a Solution.”

To make it more developmentally appropriate for younger learners, I would:

Use simpler vocabulary and add visuals or examples for each step.
Create hands-on activities that mirror the steps in the diagram (e.g., having students define a problem, prototype a solution, and test it).
Incorporate storytelling or scenarios that relate to the students’ interests to make the concepts more relatable.
For older students, I might extend the activity by asking them to analyze real-world engineering projects and map them onto the diagram, or have them compare and contrast the two methods in terms of their applications in different fields.

What questions or uncertainties do you still have about this resource?
One question I have is whether the resource could be expanded to include more examples or case studies that illustrate how these methods are applied in real-world contexts. While the diagram is excellent for explaining the steps, additional concrete examples could help students better understand how engineers and scientists actually use these processes. Another uncertainty is whether the resource adequately addresses cultural or interdisciplinary aspects of engineering and science, such as teamwork, ethics, or global perspectives.

How might your selected resource foster skills and habits of mind in students (creativity, iteration, communication, research, critical thinking, flexible thinking, problem solving etc.)?
This resource fosters several important skills and habits of mind:

Creativity : By encouraging students to brainstorm solutions and prototype designs, it promotes creative thinking and innovation.
Iteration : The emphasis on testing, analyzing results, and revising solutions reinforces the importance of iterative processes in problem-solving.
Communication : Both methods highlight the need to communicate results effectively, which is a critical skill in any field.
Research : The steps involving background research encourage students to gather information and think critically about existing knowledge.
Critical Thinking : Students must evaluate data, assess hypotheses, and determine whether solutions meet requirements, all of which require strong critical thinking skills.
Flexible Thinking : The diagram shows that both methods involve adapting plans based on new information, teaching students to be flexible and open-minded.
Problem Solving : By breaking down complex problems into manageable steps, the resource helps students develop systematic approaches to problem-solving.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Rowaa Mohamed]

I chose the video “An Eggstronaut Mission”:

This video introduces the engineering design process through a fun and engaging story where students are challenged to design a spacecraft to protect an “eggstronaut” (an egg) during a drop. It walks viewers step-by-step through the EDP: Ask, Imagine, Plan, Create, Test, and Improve, using simple language and visuals that are easy for young learners to understand. The story-based approach makes the process memorable and shows how engineering is a real-world problem-solving method.

1. Why did you select this resource?
I selected the video “An Eggstronaut Mission, because it presents the engineering design process (EDP) in a highly engaging, relatable, and age-appropriate way. It simplifies complex concepts by using storytelling and a hands-on activity that connects directly with students’ everyday thinking. This makes it easier for young learners to understand, remember, and apply the steps of the EDP. The use of an egg-drop challenge makes the learning fun and interactive, while grounding it in a real-world context.

2. What made it stand out to you personally or professionally?
What stood out to me is how the video combines both education and entertainment. Personally, I appreciate that it brings creativity and curiosity into the learning process. Professionally, it aligns well with STEAM teaching goals by encouraging students to engage in problem-solving and hands-on experimentation. It’s not just telling students what the steps are; it shows them through a story, which is more memorable and meaningful, especially for younger students.

3. How does this resource support the teaching or understanding of the engineering design process?
The video supports understanding of the EDP by different approaches as Breaking down each step clearly: Ask, Imagine, Plan, Create, Test, and Improve. Presenting the process through a real-world challenge (protecting an egg in a drop). Showing students how and why each step is important, rather than just naming them. Reinforcing note-taking and reflection, as students are encouraged to write down their thoughts, this supports students in understanding their own thinking and improves their ability to remember the steps. Additionally, the mission theme makes the EDP feel engaging and meaningful, not just an academic task.

4. How do you imagine using this in your classroom? How developmentally appropriate is this for your grade level or learners? What modifications would you make to suit your learners or context?
I would use this video to introduce or start a hands-on STEAM project, such as designing a protective structure for an egg. It serves as an excellent hook to capture student interest and model the thinking process, or using the same idea and come up with any other interesting problem to hook them and engage the to the learning process. The resource is very developmentally appropriate for elementary learners (especially grades 2–5), as it uses simple language, visuals, and humor that appeal to younger students.
I might modify by providing a graphic organizer for their notes and thoughts for each step, write or display poster for key vocabulary they got from the video as a visual aid, Give average students or low abilities the key words or questions they need to get from the video to guide them and keep them engage during the video. Give the groups time to discuss and brainstorm after the video before sharing with the class.

5. What questions or uncertainties do you still have about this resource?
One question I have is whether there is a shorter version of the video available. While the full 8-minute version is informative and engaging, some students—especially younger ones—might lose focus before it ends. A shorter version could help maintain attention and fit better within limited class time, especially when balancing other activities in a lesson.

6. How might your selected resource foster skills and habits of mind in students (creativity, iteration, communication, research, critical thinking, flexible thinking, problem solving, etc.)?
This resource fosters skills and habits of mind as Creativity: Students must design original solutions to a problem. Communication: Group work and presenting designs encourage sharing thoughts clearly. Research: Students can look into materials, gravity, and impact for stronger designs. Critical Thinking: They must evaluate what worked or didn’t work and why. Improving and redesign: If a design fails, students must rethink and try new approaches. Problem Solving: The entire project is based on addressing a challenge with real constraints.

[Rowaa Mohamed]

Dear Aya,
You did a great job explaining why this resource is meaningful to you and how it helps students understand the difference between the Scientific Method and the Engineering Design Process. I especially liked how you pointed out the importance of the visual format and how it supports students who are new to engineering concepts.
I can relate to your experience as my students also confuse the two methods and using clear visuals like this makes a big difference. Your idea to simplify the diagram for younger learners is very practical and shows your awareness of student needs.
Just an idea you might try is using a real-world example, like a simple science or engineering challenge, and asking students to match each step of the process to the diagram. That could help them see how the steps apply in real life.
Your question about adding examples or cultural aspects was thoughtful—it made me consider how we could bring in teamwork or global impact as part of the learning process.
It was great! personally, I really liked it.

[Bothaina Ellymony]

Dear Rowaa,

Thank you for sharing your reflection on the “Eggstronaut Mission” video — your enthusiasm and clarity really stood out.
I loved how clearly you explained the resource’s relevance and how it connects to your teaching context. Your breakdown of how the video simplifies the Engineering Design Process (EDP) through story and visuals was very insightful. The way you highlighted the real-world application of protecting an egg made the EDP feel tangible and fun — a perfect match for young learners.

Your reflection reminded me of an activity I did with my Year 4 students where they had to design a bridge using only straws and tape to support the weight of a toy car. Like your Eggstronaut challenge, it required students to follow each step of the EDP and pushed them to revise their plans after testing. What made the experience especially valuable was how students documented their design journey in a planning booklet, which helped them reflect on why their ideas worked or didn’t — much like your suggestion of using graphic organizers to guide thinking.

Also, your question about a shorter version of the video sparked my thinking: what if students themselves created short re-cap skits or comic strips summarizing each EDP step after watching the full video? It would boost retention and let them reprocess the content creatively.
Thanks again, Rowaa — your post sparked some great ideas for my own class.

[Author]

Posts