[Shaimaa Gaber]

Both the  ADDIE model  and  the ASSURE model give teachers a clear structure for planning effective lessons, but they differ in focus and application. The ADDIE model follows five stages—Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation and is often used for large-scale instructional design. The  ASSURE model , on the other hand, has six steps that emphasize analyzing learners, stating objectives, selecting and using media, encouraging participation, and evaluating and revising. A similarity between the two models is that both begin with analyzing learners and stress the importance of evaluation at the end. A key difference is that ADDIE is more general and suited for designing full programs, while ASSURE is more practical for daily classroom teaching and integrates technology directly. Personally, I find the ASSURE model more comfortable to use because it helps me think step-by-step about my students’ needs and how to actively engage them during lessons.

[Shaimaa Gaber]

Great job, Zina! I really liked how you made your objective very clear and measurable, especially using the “3 out of 5 comprehension questions” part. That makes it easy to check student progress. I think your example shows exactly how an aim and an objective work together.

[Shaimaa Gaber]

I really like how clearly you distinguished between the aim and the objectives. Your aim sets a broad purpose—building confidence and fluency in adding 2-digit numbers—while your objectives break this down into specific, measurable steps. I particularly like that you included both guided practice and independent demonstration, as well as a clear benchmark (80% accuracy on 8 out of 10 problems). This makes your objectives SMART : specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. It’s a well-structured example that shows exactly how learning can be observed and assessed in a math lesson.

[Author]

Posts